cebosound wrote:
Does anyone have any stats or results from an experiment finding that carbon is bad for your fish (or causes HITH, etc...)?
Its hard to believe that the makers of HOBs wouldn't try to sell more cartridges (some with carbon, some w/o)... if there is solid info out there. I would think they would try to capitalize on the issue somehow.

I have found it extremely irritating how alot of companies won't sell either media without carbon or removable carbon.
To be honest, I think they capitalize on the fact that carbon needs to be replaced so quickly. Filter cartridges sans carbon can last for months and months, whereas the carbon is recommended to be replaced in say, about 2 weeks. Thus, people will generally have to replace the whole thing if the carbon is sealed in in about 2 weeks.
I kind of look at it like 'no other option' tactics...like a company that makes their filter cartridges an 'odd' shape or size so that you have no other option generally to use theirs. Or like how Norton security comes preinstalled in your computer and bombs you with desktop popup adds about renewing your subscription. Sure, knowledgeable fishkeepers can rig up any kind of thing to fit anywhere...but the average 'joe fishnoob' thinks he needs to buy those
exact products b/c nothing else 'fits.' To be honest NONE of my cartridges were origionally intended for the filter I run, I have a collection of cut generic sponge and wool.
Again though....tetra does make the 'bio bags' with removable carbon, and i have used those before in my emperor HOB.
As for using carbon, I use it occasionally...pretty infrequently. If I do a big change/rearraignment/cleaning I'll put one of those boyd's chemi-pure bags in one of my media cartridges for a few weeks, and then take it out and replace it with biological again. But never in my mechanical filtration.