I believe you should check with more testing, it's difficult to say which measure is correct and which is not. Hopefully the LFS reading stand.
It may not be cost-efficient, but I have multiple liquid reagent test kits (API FW Master Test Kit, TetraTest Laborett, Marine Enterprises Inc Nitrate Test...) AND also test strips (for screening Nitrates mostly). This is not something I planned for, I just ran out of certain reagents and another brand was available that particular day while the one I was looking for is only for sale at certain LFS that closed early... whatever!
Sidenote: Fishkeeping in the third world can be complicated by some unimaginable issues -Have you ever visited six different LFS to find ANY brand of water dechlorinator? In the end, maybe not at the moment I experience them, obstacles make this even more fun.
I don't do scheduled weekly readings of all parameters for all tanks anymore. Observing the tanks, doing regular maintenance... I guess fish health is the best parameter to keep an eye on once the tank is established and the whole system is stable, giving nothing goes out of path.
Proper storage and handling of test reagents, as well as its manufacturing date should be considered when unexpected results come out. False positives, but even worse, false negatives do happen. Touching the sample solution with our fingertips could tamper some results.
Pepe
Santo Domingo